At the first global meeting of the ‘International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding’, hosted by the Government of Timor-Leste, Interpeace brought the voices of 50 Civil Society Organizations to the International Dialogue Conference in Dili, Timor-Leste.
The International Dialogue meeting provided an opportunity for fragile states to engage in open dialogue and share experiences amongst themselves, with development partners and with civil society on key peacebuilding and statebuilding priorities, the bottle necks and good practice in both national and international support to these areas.
The first day of the meeting was devoted to the presentation by government representatives of the main findings from country consultations conducted in Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Sierra Leone, South Sudan and Timor-Leste. Their discussion identified emerging needs and the challenges faced by their countries, which are considered to be fragile in tackling stability and development. Click here for the country reports and synthesis report.
Fast Talk captured the voices of some 50 Civil Society Organizations
Prior to the conference, Interpeace, an international peacebuilding organization, conducted a rapid consultation called ‘Fast Talk’ to gather the views of some 50 Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) on peacebuilding and statebuilding for use as a discussion piece at the conference. Two thirds of the organizations that participated in the ’Fast Talk’ were Southern based. Organizations were from Africa (West Africa network, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Somali Region, Sudan, Gambia, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, South Africa, Burundi, and DRC); Asia (South East Asia network, Timor-Leste, Fiji, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Pakistan and the Philippines); Latin America (Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras); Middle East (Israel and Lebanon) and international CSOs supporting peacebuilding and statebuilding efforts and local CSOs around the world.
The key observations from the ‘Fast Talk’ are summarized in a background paper and were presented by Joao Boavida, Executive Director, Centre of Studies of Peace and Development (CEPAD), Interpeace’s local partner in Timor-Leste. During the presentation Boavida highlighted three key points:
1. Process matters (and so does context).
The main focus of the International Dialogue Synthesis Report and the country presentations have been on peacebuilding and statebuilding, the priorities, goals and what needs to be done. What is equally important however, and that is often neglected is ‘HOW’ the priorities, the goals and ‘the what’ are translated into reality on the ground. So it is not only the WHAT that is important but also the ‘HOW’. Process matters.
2. Peacebuilding and statebuilding are complementary, but we should not overlook the potential tensions that can arise between the 2 processes.
Statebuilding by nature can be a conflict inducing process. In many post-conflict situations building a State that is the only source of wealth and resources can risk the State being instrumentalized by particular interest groups and can put statebuilding in conflict with peacebuilding.
3. Internal actors need to be drivers of both peacebuilding and statebuilding processes.
However, there is a need to move beyond a government-centric approach to include the wider society in both processes to ensure legitimacy and a broader ownership.
Boavida also added, as a recommendation for moving forward, the International Dialogue may consider:
There were 8 official members of Civil Society at the meeting itself with additional CSOs present as observers. CSO representatives were from: Somali Region (Puntland Development Research Centre), Lebanon (Peacebuilding Academy, MENA), Philippines (Initiatives for International Dialogue), Timor Leste (CEPAD/Interpeace) and 4 representatives from international CSOs (Search for Common Ground, Conciliation Resources, International Alert, European Peacebuilding Liaison Office). A serious attempt was made to bring more CSOS from conflict affected countries but this was limited due to visa restrictions and limited amount of time.
Conference Outcomes
i) Capacity development;
ii) Aid instruments and financing;
iii) Planning processes for identifying peacebuilding and statebuilding priorities; and
iv) Mechanisms for political dialogue.
Following intensive discussions at the meeting, the Action Plan foresees to include the input of Civil Society representatives into the four working groups that will be created to address the four areas mentioned above.
The Dili Declaration also includes a commitment to feed the results from the meeting into other on-going processes, including the Peacebuilding Commission Review, the implementation of the UN Secretary General’s Report on Peacebuilding, and the Millenium Development Goal Review Summit.